Motorcycle Consumer News - MCNews.com - The most complete, most detailed and most accurate information about every aspect of motorcycling.
Meet the Staff Home Community Magazine Shopping Resources Contact Us
Motorcycle Consumer News
Rules-Read First    Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        

Home » Motorcycle Consumer News Center » Forum Feedback » loud pipes save lives article

««1234»»»

loud pipes save lives article Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 10/21/2004 6:51:30 AM


Advanced Member

Advanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:25:17 PM
Posts: 2,059, Visits: 1,827
Somehow I get the feeling that ONLY you guys are right. Sounds like a political discussion.

BigHarleyDude

OzarkWingGuy
GoldWing '08

Post #18651
Posted 10/21/2004 7:27:10 AM


Advanced Member

Advanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:25:17 PM
Posts: 2,059, Visits: 1,827
quote:
Originally posted by hoopdc

I'll tell you why. Because loud pipes are thought to be among other things, a juvenile approach to getting attention AND, and this is BIG, those pipes AFFECT OTHERS in a negative way.
And P-L-E-E-Z-E don't play defense lawyer ( ala johnnie Cochran , Shapiro, the dearly departed Kunstler, etc. ) and use the very laws that are designed to protect and serve us ( all of us ) by twisting them and twisting them some more to make a point that only serves as a disservice to the majority. Never mind common courtesy.
YES, their 'rights' are as important as mine BUT, and this is also BIG, NOT when their 'rights' AFFECT OTHERS. Is this sinking in yet ??
And please don't use these crazy anologies to make it seem like you are more intelligent, more tolerant, more civilized, etc.
I don't care if a smoker wants to smoke himself to death. I really don't. That's their 'right'. But they cannot and should not have the 'right' to smoke indoors because............. it AFFECTS OTHERS. Sinking in yet ?? How do you like my analogy ?

Loud pipes in public ?? No. Because it AFFECTS OTHERS. ( hope you're getting this )
Turn your stereo ALL THE WAY UP in your home ?? Great !! In PUBLIC ? Of course not !! Know why ?? Because it AFFECTS OTHERS. Are you getting this yet ??
And just to be clear, I am not talking about pipes that make a nice rumble. We're talking these ridiculous pipes that pi** people off. No, I don't know EXACTLY where to draw the line, but you know what we're talking about in this thread.



You know I almost ignored your whole message but something inside me just made me want to respond so maybe you might realize a few manners. First I'll say right up front I agree with you. But I don't agree with your dis-agreeability. I'm concerned about freedom and where we draw the line. I doubt too many of these freedoms will be lost in my lifetime at my age. But I doubt the writers of our Bill of Rights realized we'd be fighting for our right to keep and bear arms and the way state's try to pass laws to evade this right.

You accuse me of playing defense lawyer but lawyers are actively involved in eroding our rights. If you had any idea the legal lobby going on by insurance companies, I dare say you might temper some of your statements. So if you want to talk about "twisting" laws talk to those guys and don't bother with your accusations to your "friends." Your one statement, "Never mind common courtesy," pretty much speaks for itself, I won't dignify that with a response, I have too much courtesy.

You mentioned my "crazy" analogy. I was not using analogies. I was pointing out that our legislators can go overboard. You ask how I liked your analogy and mentioned smoking. I think it was a good analogy. My Dad died recently from smoking. BUT the analogy is bad. I don't know anyone dying from noise pollution. I'm sure you will enlighten me.

You ask several times if "I was getting this." "Yes" I got it loud and clear. Trouble is, I "get" you guys all the time. Thats what makes my job so "pleasant." Thats not an analogy thats satire.

In closing, I know I used to agree with you. But now I'm wondering why. Maybe I'm changing my mind. Thank you for helping me with that. Your persuasion is overwhelming.

Now looking for LOUDD pipes to cruise the Ozarks,
BigHarleyDude

OzarkWingGuy
GoldWing '08

Post #18652
Posted 10/21/2004 5:25:40 PM


Advanced Member

Advanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced Member

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:39:21 PM
Posts: 3,215, Visits: 1,765
quote:
Originally posted by OzarkHarleyGuy

I'm concerned about freedom and where we draw the line. I doubt too many of these freedoms will be lost in my lifetime at my age. But I doubt the writers of our Bill of Rights realized we'd be fighting for our right to keep and bear arms and the way state's try to pass laws to evade this right.

You accuse me of playing defense lawyer but lawyers are actively involved in eroding our rights. If you had any idea the legal lobby going on by insurance companies, I dare say you might temper some of your statements. So if you want to talk about "twisting" laws talk to those guys and don't bother with your accusations to your "friends." Your one statement, "Never mind common courtesy," pretty much speaks for itself, I won't dignify that with a response, I have too much courtesy.



BigHarleyDude, I agree with you 100% about the loss of rights in this country. What has happened in this country even since 9/11 is unbelievable. And the lawyers and politicians (don't forget most politicians are lawyers) have sold our freedom to the highest bidder. The people who don't believe in the slippery slope theory have never owned a gun. You are so right.

Where I differ with you is noise laws have been on the books for years (the MI law was made in the late 60s.) These are not loss of freedoms they are lack of enforcement for the laws all ready on the books.

The old saying your right to swing you fist stops where my nose begins ring trues with loud pipes. Another one is a no smoking area in a restaurant is like a no p e e i n g area in a pool.

But I get your slipery slope point. I even go further by believing if there is no victim there is no crime and should not be a law.

Torqueman
Goldwing 03


Torqueman
Battle Creek, MI
V-Strom 06
Goldwing 03
Post #18653
Posted 10/21/2004 9:34:42 PM


Advanced Member

Advanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced MemberAdvanced Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:25:17 PM
Posts: 2,059, Visits: 1,827
Thank you Torque for helping me show others how to have a healthy exchange of ideas.

BigHarleyDude

OzarkWingGuy
GoldWing '08

Post #18654
Posted 10/30/2004 6:33:31 AM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/16/2008 7:11:51 AM
Posts: 261, Visits: 1,003
quote:
a no smoking area in a restaurant is like a no p e e i n g area in a pool.
Torqueman
Goldwing 03




ROFLMAO

John

Isaac Newton is my co-pilot.

John

Isaac Newton is my co-pilot.
Post #18655
Posted 2/18/2005 2:05:21 PM
New Member

New MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew MemberNew Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 4/1/2008 8:45:20 AM
Posts: 78, Visits: 13
I agree that loud pipes are a way of getting attention. However, I will also say that once when driving my cage I heard loud pipes from a bike somewhere behind me. It took a good 10 seconds or so before I saw the bike, but I was well aware that a bike was in the vicinity. So, I'd say that loud pipes do make it safer to ride, but that's not most have them. tls

jib

jib
Post #18656
Posted 2/19/2005 12:40:11 PM
Average Member